Reuters Blogs

DealZone

Behind the deals and deal-makers

Archive for June, 2009

June 30th, 2009

Private equity making Asia inroads

Posted by: Megan Davies

U.S. private equity firms are making further inroads in Asia.

Overnight, Carlyle announced it raised $1.04 billion for its fourth Asian growth capital fund — nearly double the size of its previous such fund.

The fund has already made investments into companies including the high-end Chinese women’s apparel maker Ellassay. Fundraising is exceptionally tough right now for private equity firms. Carlyle said nearly 40 percent of the fund’s investors are new and that it raised the fund in 14 months, reflecting improved investor sentiment towards China and India.

Blackstone, increasingly aggressive in Asia, on Monday hired an executive from Deutsche Asset Management to lead its capital raising efforts across the Asia-Pacific region. The firm has also been talking to the Shanghai city government to set up a wholly owned China subsidiary as it prepares to launch a local currency private equity fund, sources previously told Reuters.

Deals of the day: 

* Japan’s Shinsei Bank and Aozora Bank, two loss-making lenders backed by U.S. investors, are likely to announce plans on Wednesday to merge by next year, two sources familiar with the matter said.  
 
* Shareholders in Australian investment firm Macquarie Communications Infrastructure Group voted in favour of a $1.3 billion takeover offer from the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB). 

* Belgium-based RHJ International is close to a deal to buy a stake in Opel after talks between parent General Motors and preferred bidder Magna International hit snags. 

* Swedish software company Global Gaming Factory X AB said it had agreed to buy free file-sharing website The Pirate Bay, and that it would find ways to compensate copyright owners for downloaded material. 
    
* Shanghai Airlines expects a detailed plan for a long-anticipated merger with China Eastern Airlines to emerge next month, a senior executive at the airline said. 

* Finland’s Ruukki Group Plc said it would acquire Australia’s platinum-group metals producer Sylvania Resources Ltd for 268 million euros ($378.1 million) under a merger implementation agreement.

* Russia’s Alfa Group, locked in a five-year boardroom war with Telenor, has halted talks with the Norwegian telecoms group on a potential merger of their Russian and Ukrainian assets, an Alfa official said.

June 30th, 2009

Is Genentech taking over Roche?

Posted by: Sam Cage

Roche’s megabucks Genentech buy is looking more like a reverse takeover — in some ways, at least.

Roche headquartersThe Swiss drugmaker splashed out $47 billion to buy out its biotech partner to secure access to Genentech’s impressive new drugs. But Roche’s U.S. operations are to operate under the Genentech name and research, development and commercial operations are all being based at the U.S. group’s South San Francisco headquarters.

Now Roche doesn’t even consider itself Big Pharma. It says it will leave the industry group Pharmaceuticals Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) but will retain Genentech’s membership of the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO).

“As part of the world’s largest biotechnology company, Genentech and Roche believe that BIO’s purpose is closely aligned with the direction of the new company and, therefore, can represent the company’s interests in Washington, among policymakers, legislators and the general public,” Roche said in a statement.

PHOTO CREDIT: People are reflected in a window (R) as they walk past the headquarters of Swiss pharmaceutical company Roche in Basel February 4, 2009. REUTERS/Christian Hartmann

June 30th, 2009

Deals du Jour

Posted by: Douwe Miedema

General Motors (GMGMQ.PK) is talking to rival suitors to sell a stake in Opel, the Financial Times says,  primarily Brussels-based RHJ International (RHJI.BR). Magna is still in pole position.

Japan’s Shinsei Bank and Aozora Bank are likely to announce plans to merge by next year, sources familiar with the matter say. The two loss-making lenders are backed by U.S. investors. Read the Reuters story here.

For more Reuters news on deals, click here. Below are two other stories we spotted in newspapers.

Private equity group Candover (CDI.L) has received approaches from trade buyers for Ontex, the Belgium-based maker of diapers and wet wipes, the Financial Times says .

Activist hedge fund firm The Children’s Investment Fund (TCI) is considering offering more flexible terms to investors and a different fee structure, the Wall Street Journal says.

June 29th, 2009

FirstGroup targets National Express

Posted by: Adam Durchslag

FirstGroup, the Aberdeen-based transport group led by its chairman Martin Gilbert, confirmed on Monday that it made an approach for smaller, embattled National Express on June 19.

But, National Express’s newly appointed chairman, John Devaney, and his chief executive, Richard Bowker, believe they can go it alone and have firmly rebuffed First Group. They are hoping, instead, to launch a £400 million rights issue.

This is not the first time the two companies have been linked as merger partners: there was talk three years ago of doing a £3 billion, nil-premium merger.

This time, however, FirstGroup made its opportunistic all-share merger proposal to National Express, after talks broke down between the British government and National Express over a bail-out of its London-to-Edinburgh East Coast Mainline franchise.

“No bail-outs in rail” is the government’s stance on the matter. No surprise there, then, when the coffers over at Treasury are empty.

“National Express now faces the choice of either racking up huge losses at East Coast or defaulting on the franchise, which would mean exiting UK rail altogether,” believes UK broker Collins Stewart.

National Express has been particularly hit hard from the cost of the East Coast line. To pay the government £138 million per year, it needs annual passenger revenue growth of at least 9 percent. It has only managed 0.3 percent in the first quarter.

That doesn’t put National Express in a very good position, when it has around £1.2 billion of net debt on its balance sheet. Indeed, its shares have more or less collapsed over the course of the year by around 70 percent, despite being confident that it will meet its renegotiated debt covenant tests tomorrow.

Advised by JPMorgan Cazenove, FirstGroup is clearly exploiting the situation, given that up until this point its strategy had always been focussed on cash generation and organic growth while it lumbered under a £2.5 billion debt pile.

“Without rail and with a sensible balance sheet structure – our sum-of-the-parts points to a fair value of around 500p for National Express,” says Collins Stewart. That’s about 70 percent above where the company’s share price is currently.

Buying National Express would make First Group into the UK’s biggest transport company. Failing that, there are plenty of other companies out there that might look to do a deal during these hard times: Arriva, Go-Ahead, and Stagecoach all come to mind.

June 29th, 2009

Missing CEO? He’s around here somewhere….

Posted by: Megan Davies

By Steve James

Although Enterprise Products Partners CEO Michael Creel could not join a conference call with analysts to dicuss his company’s planned $3.3 billion acquisition Teppco Partners, the energy pipeline company was quick to reassure investors all was well.

“He is not hiking the Appalachian Trail, he is not in Argentina and his wife IS with him,” Randy Burkhalter, Enterprise’s executive in charge of investor relations, told the call.

It was a joking reference to South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford, who last week admitted cheating on his wife with a woman in Argentina, where he had disappared for several days. His office had told reporters during his absence that Sanford was hiking the Appalachian Trail.

A spokesman for Houston-based Enterprise said Creel was “out of town” and was unable to take part in the analyst call.

June 29th, 2009

Blow for blow

Posted by: Paritosh Bansal

Hostile dealsHostile deals – and there are a few going on – have one unintended consequence: too many press releases.

Every side feels compelled to correct a rival’s spin as things heat up, which means almost every press statement has an equal and opposite reaction.

In Bermuda, a three-way battle between IPC, Validus and Max Capital flooded the wires for weeks with innumerable press releases, as each side tried to make a case for why their deal was better. (Shareholders voted down an IPC-Max deal, but the fight is not over yet.)

Sometimes the new point is, well, a rather fine point.

Consider this statement put out by Agrium, which is battling to take over rival CF.

Mike Wilson, Agrium’s CEO:
“Following a successful stockholder referendum on Agrium’s offer and after we reached out to CF and its advisors, CF’s Chairman and CEO Steve Wilson told me that CF would not meet with Agrium. Contradicting recent public comments that CF is prepared to engage, he stated to me that ‘there is no reason to meet because nothing has changed.’ Steve Wilson said he called since stockholders wanted him to engage with Agrium. I do not consider returning my phone calls to say that CF refuses to meet to be engagement and I don’t think CF stockholders will either.”

This time, though, CF did not rush out its own statement to address the allegation by Agrium’s Wilson that CF’s Wilson was contradicting his recent public comments.

CF spokesman Charles Nekvasil, when reached by phone, said the company did not “wish to engage in duelling press releases or press statements.”

And then he added: “Our position is that — as we spelled out last week when our CEO did an interview — nothing has changed from the perspective of the Agrium offer. We have indicated that given that situation we are willing to listen but nothing new is on the table.”

June 29th, 2009

Investors worry about Towers Watson

Posted by: Paritosh Bansal

Watson Wyatt and Towers Perrin executives are excited about their deal to create Towers Watson, but investors are not cheering as much. 

Watson Wyatt’s shares plunged nearly 10 percent in Monday morning trading, as investors woke up to the all-stock deal valued at about $3.5 billion, announced Sunday.

A Citi analyst downgraded the Watson Wyatt, which is publicly held, to “hold” from “buy”, calling the companies’ three-year integration plan a “major risk.” 

Among the concerns: integration and deal costs may lower earnings, and rivals like Hewitt and Mercer could grab people and other opportunities in the interim. 

It will take three years to achieve savings of $80 million through job cuts and the streamlining of overlapping operations. The companies also expect one-time costs of $80 million from the merger and “significant noncash expenses” for the first two years. 

“The merger will create a global leader, but the three-year path to accretion could imply a difficult integration,” Citi analyst Ashwin Shirvaikar wrote in a research note.

June 29th, 2009

Live coverage of Bernie Madoff sentencing

Posted by: Richard Baum

Welcome to our live coverage of the Bernie Madoff sentencing. Reuters journalists are outside and inside the Manhattan court where the admitted thief will hear his punishment for running Wall Street’s biggest and most brazen investment scheme. Reuters.com’s intern, Franz Strasser, is sending us updates from the scene that you can follow in the live headline box below.

(Editor’s note: Readers’ comments will appear in a smaller font.)

Update: The live coverage has now ended, but you can still leave a comment below.

June 29th, 2009

Deals du Jour

Posted by: Douwe Miedema

TMT is heating up. Vodafone, the British mobile phone operator, is pondering a bid for T-Mobile UK, while Microsoft has hired Morgan Stanley to sell its digital agency Razorfish. Both stories are in the Financial Times. Private equity group Candover says it has ended talks with potential acquirers, confident it can meet debt covenants. For all Reuters Deals news, click here.

And here’s what other media are writing today.

* Anglo American (AAL.L) is building its defences against a 41 billion pound ($67.74 billion) merger approach from Xstrata (XTA.L) by plotting talks about a major Chinese investment, the Sunday Telegraph reported.

* Switzerland’s UBS (UBSN.VX) is to pay 3 to 5 billion Swiss francs ($2.77-$4.62 billion) in the next two weeks to settle a U.S. tax probe into the bank, Swiss newspaper Sonntag reported on Sunday.

* China National Offshore Oil Corp (CNOOC) (0883.HK) and Petrochina are planning bids for a stake in Canadian oil firm InterOil Corp’s (IOC.N) natural gas project that could be worth up to $500 million, the South China Morning Post reported on Monday.

* The potential buyer of General Motors Corp’s (GMGMQ.PK) Hummer division will begin formal talks with Chinese regulators on Monday in an effort to win approval for its acquisition, The Wall Street Journal said on Saturday.

* British train and bus operator National Express Group Plc <NEX.L> has rejected an unsolicited takeover bid from rival FirstGroup Plc <FGP.L>, the Financial Times reported on Monday, without citing sources.

June 26th, 2009

X-raying Xstrata

Posted by: Chris Spink

Xstrata is different from most other major mining companies. Rather than being a long established group with strong links to a particular country, such as Australia for Rio and BHP, South Africa for Anglo American, or Brazil for Vale, it is a relative upstart with few ties to any particular territory, aside from its tax inspired domicile, Switzerland.

The group’s culture might seem innocuous but it is important, particularly when Xstrata has this week proposed a “merger of equals” with South African stalwart Anglo American. Unlike many of its rivals, Xstrata’s raison d’etre is doing deals, led by raucous chief executive Mick Davis.

The company floated in March 2002 with an initial value of £2 billion. Since then, a number of transformational acquisitions such as the $19 billion purchase of Falconbridge, and the recovery in global commodity prices, has meant the group is now valued at £20 billion. At its record high last year, when it tried to buy platinum producer Lonmin, it was worth £67 billion.

Xstrata’s strength is that it has always been much closer to its customers than other, perhaps more parochial groups keener on looking after their employees. The presence of trading entity Glencore on its shareholder register, with a third of Xstrata’s stock, is testament to this.

Davis’s true loyalty showed earlier this year when he effectively enabled Glencore to retain this stake, by funding its participation in January’s £4.1 billion rights issue, via a side deal selling certain Glencore coal assets in Colombia to the group for $2 billion.

The current tilt at Anglo American, now worth £24 billion, looks a deal too far for Xstrata. For one, Glencore looks likely to be diluted down to a sixth of the combined group, as the proposal currently lies. Secondly, Anglo American will vigorously defend its independence, as it is already showing, helped by implicit South African support.

Glencore must have approved Xstrata’s move but that in effect puts Xstrata in play, if it is indeed willing to effectively relinquish control. That is highly significant. The end result might either see Anglo American making a “pacman” offer for Xstrata to defend itself or else encourage Vale, which has approached Xstrata before, to make a play for it.

Ultimately Xstrata, with few political connections, looks the more vulnerable participant in this process.